The Trust Triangle: How Great Affiliates, Advertisers, & Networks Align

In performance marketing, the line between a "good" and "bad" partner can seem blurry. In reality, the difference between an average affiliate and a professional one—or a high-performing advertiser and a failing one—is rarely about a single metric. It’s a combination of mindset, communication, and professionalism.

But what do those qualities look like in practice? To find out, we sat down with Josh Littler and Sonia Vidal, co-founders of the agency Digital Mojito, to dissect the traits that truly separate the great from the average. They provided a practical playbook for identifying professional partners, diagnosing campaign failures, and understanding the shared responsibilities that hold the industry together.

What Separates a Professional Affiliate From a Casual One?

According to Sonia and Josh, it boils down to three distinct traits that separate a business-minded partner from someone just “pushing volume.”

1. They Treat It Like a Business

A professional affiliate treats every campaign like its own business. They are focused on the long-term, understand the importance of ROI, and aim to build lasting partnerships.

A casual or average affiliate, on the other hand, operates with a different motive. Their goal is often to push as much volume as possible, regardless of the results or long-term consequences.

"...they just kind of, try and do… deliver traffic and just hope they get away with it..." — Sonia Vidal

2. They Know Their Numbers

Professionals understand their data. They know their target click-through rates (CTRs), earnings per click (EPCs), and conversion rates. They use this data to have intelligent conversations and optimize performance.

In contrast, average affiliates often send traffic blindly, pay little attention to the results, and may have poor tracking setups, making optimization impossible.

3. They Respect Compliance

This is a non-negotiable for professionals. They respect geo-targeting rules, brand guidelines, and all campaign restrictions. A casual affiliate might ignore these rules, hoping they don't get caught, which inevitably leads to problems for the advertiser, the network, and their own reputation.

How to Diagnose a Failing Campaign

When a campaign is performing poorly, it's easy to point fingers. However, the data usually tells a clear story about where the problem lies. Sonia breaks down how to diagnose the issue step-by-step:

• Low CTR : This is a clear sign that the audience doesn't align with the offer's creative. Essentially, the affiliate's traffic source and the creative's message are mismatched.
• High CTR, Low CVR: This signals friction on the landing page. The user was interested enough to click on the creative, but something on the page itself—be it the design, copy, or even the user experience—is causing them to drop off. The creative and the landing page don't "marry."
• Good CVR, Low Approval Rate: This is a major red flag for the advertiser. It means users are successfully signing up, but the quality is low, or the advertiser's follow-up process is failing.

Why High-Quality Traffic Fails

An affiliate can send perfectly-targeted, high-intent traffic, only to see it fail. More often than not, the breakdown happens after the conversion.

The Follow-Up Black Hole

The most common reason that high-quality leads fail to convert for an advertiser is a poor or slow follow-up process.

Sonia gives the example of a user interested in solar panels. If the advertiser’s call center calls that user 15-30 minutes after they fill out the form, the user is engaged and ready. If they call three weeks later, the user likely won't remember the company and won't answer the phone.

A smart advertiser educates their affiliates on their process and, more importantly, caps their daily leads to match what their call center or other follow-up mechanisms can realistically handle, ensuring no lead goes cold.

The Cost of Delayed Feedback

Nothing destroys trust faster than poor communication. When an affiliate sends traffic, they are making an initial investment. If the advertiser fails to give feedback, the affiliate continues sending traffic, assuming everything is fine.

The worst-case scenario is when the advertiser goes dark, only to turn around weeks later and scrub all their leads, claiming they weren't converting. This lack of communication damages the advertiser's reputation and hurts the affiliate or network that has to mediate the dispute.

Red Flags: When to Be Wary of an Advertiser

For networks and affiliates, spotting a potentially untrustworthy advertiser early is crucial. The most common red flags include:

• Lack of feedback and poor communication.
• Delayed payments that stretch a "Net 30" to a "Net 90" or "Net 120."
• Changing terms or payouts in the middle of a campaign without warning.
• Poor tracking or postbacks that consistently fail.
• Rejecting conversions without providing a detailed report or valid reason.

The Network’s Role: Guardian of the Ecosystem

The network sits in the middle, and its primary job is to be the guardian of the ecosystem, adding value for both the affiliate and the advertiser.

The Balancing Act: Compliance vs. Motivation

A network must enforce an advertiser's rules, but it also must protect affiliates from unreasonable demands.

Sonia shared an example of an advertiser who, after one minor compliance breach, tried to implement an extremely long and detailed due diligence document. The advertiser's legal team then took a month to approve each new affiliate. Affiliates, understandably, refused to wait and simply moved to competitors.

Digital Mojito stepped in, explaining to the advertiser that their process was crippling the campaign. By mediating, they found a solution that protected the advertiser without punishing motivated affiliates.

The Technology That Builds Credibility

For an affiliate, a network's credibility relies on its technology. A reliable tracking platform is essential, as it saves time and provides the deep insights needed to scale. Affiliates look for features like:

• A First Layer of Fraud Prevention: A tool that can verify traffic is clean before it gets to the advertiser.
• Multi-Event Tracking: The ability to track the user journey from start to finish, providing valuable data for optimization.

The Hard Line: Handling Non-Payment

When an advertiser refuses to pay for valid conversions, the network must take a hard stance. Digital Mojito's policy is simple: "If there's not a report, we are not rejecting it."

A network's job is to advocate for the affiliate when leads are valid, just as it must advocate for the advertiser when leads are fraudulent (e.g., multiple freebie sign-ups to the same address). This transparency is key to maintaining loyalty.

The Final Verdict: A Shared Responsibility

So, who carries the greatest responsibility for maintaining ethical standards—the affiliate, the advertiser, or the network?

According to Josh and Sonia, it’s a shared responsibility, with each playing a critical role:

• Affiliates are responsible for controlling the traffic, using compliant methods like opt-in lists, and not generating fraud.
• Advertisers are responsible for the user's experience after the click, ensuring ethical follow-up, honoring payable leads, and having their own systems for data validation.
• Networks are responsible for accurate tracking, enforcing compliance, and providing a layer of transparency and knowledge that connects both sides.

Ultimately, while the responsibility is shared, Josh and Sonia argue the network acts as the “central nervous system”, investing in the technology and relationships to ensure the entire system operates on a level foundation of trust.

‍